Lynn S. Adler and Rebecca E. Irwin. 2005. Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar. Ecology 86:2968–2978.

Appendices

Appendix A: Methods of HPLC-MS analysis of Gelsemium nectar samples.
Ecological Archives E086-161-A1.

Appendix B: A table showing the effect of nectar treatment (high vs. low gelsemine), floral morph (pin vs. thrum), and their interaction on components of bee preference in 2002.
Ecological Archives E086-161-A2.

Appendix C: A table showing the effect of nectar treatment (high vs. low alkaloid), floral morph (pin vs. thrum), and their interaction on components of bee preference in 2004.
Ecological Archives E086-161-A3.

Appendix D: A table showing the repeated-measures analysis of dye donation per flower dyed in 2002.
Ecological Archives E086-161-A4.

Appendix E: A table showing the means ± standard error for measures of female reproduction in 2002 and 2004, broken down by floral morph and nectar treatment.
Ecological Archives E086-161-A5.

Copyright


ESA Publications | Ecological Archives | Permissions | Citation | Contacts