Ecological Archives E096-067-A2
Melissa Whitman and James D. Ackerman. 2015. Terrestrial orchids in a tropical forest: best sites for abundance differ from those for reproduction. Ecology 96:693–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/14-0104.1
Appendix B. Isometric and allometric scaling of leaf traits, reproductive effort and size-density relationships. Tables include linear regression results; Reduce Major Axis (RMA) slope and confidence intervals; and significance of differences between observed and predicted slopes.
Tables include linear regression results; Reduce Major Axis (RMA) slope and confidence intervals; as well as significance of differences between observed and predicted slopes.
Table B1. Isometric and allometric scaling of leaf traits.
Leaf Traits All values log 10 transformed |
Linear Regression |
Reduced Major Axis (RMA) |
|||||
n |
R² |
P value |
Observed |
95% Confidence |
Predicted Slope |
P value |
|
Lamina area (cm²) ∝ Number of leaves |
218 |
0.13 |
< 0.001 |
2.13 |
1.88 - 2.40 |
2/1 (2.0) |
0.33 |
Lamina area (cm²) ∝ Petiole length (cm) |
218 |
0.68 |
< 0.001 |
1.55 |
1.43 - 1.67 |
2/1 (2.0) |
< 0.001 |
Lamina width (cm) ∝ Lamina length (cm) |
218 |
0.90 |
< 0.001 |
1.16 |
1.12 - 1.21 |
1/1 (1.0) |
< 0.001 |
Table B2. Isometric and allometric scaling of reproductive effort.
Reproductive Effort All values log 10 transformed |
Linear Regression |
Reduced Major Axis (RMA) |
|||||
n |
R² |
P value |
Observed |
95% Confidence |
Predicted Slope |
P value |
|
Scape length (mm) ∝ Lamina area (cm²) |
30 |
0.37 |
< 0.001 |
0.62 |
0.45 - 0.83 |
1/2 (0.5) |
0.18 |
Total flowers (#) ∝ Lamina area (cm²) |
30 |
0.50 |
< 0.001 |
0.98 |
0.75 - 1.28 |
3/2 (1.5) |
0.003 |
Table B3. Testing predicted plant size-density relationship for herbaceous monocots.
Plant Size as a Function of Density All values log 10 transformed; only sites with > 1 orchid |
Linear Regression |
Reduced Major Axis (RMA) |
|||||
n |
R² |
P value |
Observed |
95% Confidence |
Predicted |
P value |
|
Lamina area (cm²) for the smallest individual ∝ Total orchid density (m²), per subplot |
39 |
0.48 |
< 0.001 |
-1.5 |
-1.90 - (-1.19) |
- 0.44 |
< 0.001 |
Lamina area (cm²) for the largest individual ∝ Total orchid density (m²), per subplot |
39 |
0.13 |
0.015 |
0.67 |
0.49 - 0.90 |
- 0.44 |
< 0.001 |