Ecological Archives A025-125-A2

María Uriarte, Benjamin L. Turner, Jill Thompson, and Jess K. Zimmerman. 2015. Linking spatial patterns of leaf litterfall and soil nutrients in a tropical forest: a neighborhood approach. Ecological Applications 25:2022–2034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/15-0112.1

Appendix B. Detailed nutrient data for the 12 study species and soil map of the study site.

Table B1. Leaf litter C:N and N:P ratios for each of the 12 tree species growing in different land cover class. Forest canopy cover derived from aerial photos taken in 1936: 2 = 20–50%, 3 = 50–80% and 4=80–100% forest cover. Litter of T. heterophylla was not found in baskets in cover class 4. Successional status determined from Thompson et al. (2002).

 

 

Cover class 2

Cover class 3

Cover class 4

Species

Succ. status

C:N

N:P

C:N

N:P

C:N

N:P

A. latifolia

Secondary

36.37

21.25

36.48

21.50

39.89

27.82

B. tetraphylla

Late

44.46

35.57

32.45

34.41

41.25

32.46

C. arborea

Secondary

34.32

30.82

27.96

35.88

30.38

32.59

C. schreberiana

Pioneer

27.31

25.59

32.92

36.98

33.02

27.05

D. excelsa

Late

54.70

42.23

55.33

43.63

55.11

42.68

G. guidonia

Late

32.38

16.37

28.25

21.78

28.27

16.09

I. laurina

Secondary

25.34

39.22

24.64

41.43

25.70

41.76

M. bidentata

Late

66.27

47.36

59.55

53.30

66.36

50.73

P. montana

Secondary

32.39

19.94

34.24

20.67

34.92

21.44

S. morototoni

Pioneer

44.58

26.90

43.05

28.53

34.52

19.71

S. berteriana

Late

49.06

25.82

45.04

39.95

48.76

35.93

T. heterophylla

Secondary

42.08

26.18

42.45

35.75

NA

NA

 

Table B2. Percent C, N, P in leaf litter for each the 12 tree species growing in different soil types. The distribution and composition of the LFDP soil meant that the majority of leaf litter was collected from baskets in Zarzal (86 out of 120) or Cristal (29 out of 120) soils with only 2 baskets in fluvaquents and 3 in Prieto (Appendix B: Fig. 1). Blank cells indicate that no leaf material was collected in baskets for that soil type.

 

Zarzal

Fluvaquent

Cristal

Prieto

Species

C

N

P

C

N

P

C

N

P

C

N

P

A. latifolia

48.98

1.33

0.05

     

48.59

1.27

0.05

     

B. tetraphylla

50.49

1.34

0.05

     

49.77

1.17

0.03

50.05

1.21

0.04

C. arborea

52.58

1.86

0.05

51.10

1.82

0.05

52.08

1.48

0.04

     

C. schreberiana

47.94

1.35

0.03

     

45.91

1.74

0.05

     

D. excelsa

45.75

0.83

0.02

45.23

0.93

0.02

44.13

0.80

0.02

45.89

0.87

0.02

G. guidonia

50.16

1.72

0.09

48.58

1.51

0.07

49.68

1.74

0.10

49.15

1.71

0.11

I. laurina

47.89

1.89

0.04

47.46

1.84

0.04

46.95

1.93

0.05

47.85

1.82

0.04

M. bidentata

52.94

0.85

0.02

52.77

0.75

0.01

52.44

0.74

0.02

52.40

0.86

0.02

P. montana

46.03

1.41

0.06

44.15

1.48

0.06

44.59

1.40

0.06

     

S. morototoni

50.75

1.25

0.04

                 

S. berteriana

49.03

1.08

0.03

     

47.30

0.96

0.02

47.55

1.10

0.03

T. heterophylla

48.31

1.08

0.03

     

46.99

1.05

0.03

     

 

FigB1

Fig. B1. Distribution of soil types and soil sampling points (magenta points) and leaf litter baskets (black points) in the LFDP.


[Back to A025-125]