Appendix D. Split-plot ANOVA of the effects of latitude and category on main stem basal area measured as the log of basal area per 0.0625 ha.
| Source | df | Mean Square | F | P | |
| Latitude | 4 | 5.40 |
3.55 |
0.1235 | |
| (40o + 30o) × (20o + 10o + 0o) | 1 | 13.19 | 8.68 | 0.0422* | |
| 40o × 30o | 1 | 7.58 | 4.99 | 0.0892 | |
| 20o × (10o + 0o) | 1 | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.4909 | |
| 10o × 0o | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.9665 | |
| Site (Latitude) | 4 |
1.52 |
11.83 | 0.0001* | |
| Plot (Site (Latitude)) | 135 | 0.13 |
0.99 |
0.5251 | |
| Category | 3 |
168.07 |
1291.76 | 0.0001* | |
| (1 + 2 + 3) × 4 | 1 | 187.55 | 1441.50 | 0.0001* | |
| 1 × (2 + 3) | 1 | 278.97 | 2144.21 | 0.0001* | |
| 2 × 3 | 1 | 37.68 | 289.58 | 0.0001* | |
| Latitude × Category | 12 | 3.68 | 28.27 | 0.0001* | |
|
|
(40 + 30) vs. (20 + 10 + 0) × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 | 18.04 | 138.64 | 0.0001* |
| (40 + 30) vs. (20 + 10 + 0) × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 2.27 | 17.48 | 0.0001* | |
| (40 + 30) vs.(20 + 10 + 0) × 2 vs. 3 | 1 |
0.01 |
0.06 | 0.8104 | |
| 40 vs.30 × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 | 13.58 | 104.35 | 0.0001* | |
| 40 vs. 30 × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.6613 | |
| 40 vs. 30 × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 0.44 | 3.36 | 0.0676 | |
| 20 vs.(10 + 0) × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 |
0.44 |
3.35 | 0.0679 | |
| 20 vs.(10 + 0) × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 0.73 | 5.60 | 0.0185* | |
| 20 vs. (10 + 0) × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 1.73 | 13.31 | 0.0003* | |
| 10 vs. 0 × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 | 2.73 | 20.97 | 0.0001* | |
| 10 vs. 0 × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.7209 | |
| 10 vs. 0 × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.6451 | |
| Category × Plot (Site (Latitude)) | 417 | 0.13 | |||
| Total | 575 |
Notes:
Main effect was latitude with split plot effect of site and a split-split plot
effect of categories. Latitude and categories were fixed; site and plot replicates
were random. Category legend: (1) shrub layer; (2) subcanopy; (3) canopy; (4)
liana. An asterisk denotes statistical significance at
= 0.05; R2 = 0.92. The dependent variable was log(basal area).