Appendix C. Maximum-likelihood estimates of θ and m, with J = 2000, θ = 100, σ = 0.001 or 0.002, and various dispersal rates from the metacommunity.
TABLE C1. Maximum-likelihood estimates (Etienne 2005) of θ and m, with J = 2000, θ = 100, σ = 0.001 or 0.002, and various dispersal rates from the metacommunity (see the figures for the 95%-confidence envelopes). S is the total number of species.
S |
θ |
m |
||
σ = 0.001 |
m = 0.002 |
13 |
1.772 |
1.0 |
m = 0.01 |
34 |
5.909 |
0.732 |
|
m = 0.05 |
81 |
16.817 |
1.0 |
|
m = 0.25 |
152 |
38.049 |
1.0 |
|
σ = 0.002 |
m = 0.002 |
8 |
0.973 |
1.0 |
m = 0.01 |
18 |
2.634 |
1.0 |
|
m = 0.05 |
46 |
8.288 |
1.0 |
|
m = 0.25 |
96 |
20.888 |
1.0 |
|
|
| FIG. C1. Rank abundance curves of simulation results (thick solid lines) and 95%-confidence envelopes (dashed lines) for a nearly neutral local community of J = 2000, θ = 100, σ = 0.001 under different dispersal rates from the metacommunity. Shown are the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile abundances for each rank estimated from 600 simulated communities. |
|
| FIG. C2. Rank abundance curves of simulation results (thick solid lines) and 95%-confidence envelopes (dashed lines) for a nearly neutral local community of J = 2000, θ = 100, σ = 0.002 under different dispersal rates from the metacommunity. Shown are the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile abundances for each rank estimated from 600 simulated communities. |