Appendix A. A figure showing meta-analysis results calculated using the log response ratio effect size metric and a single randomly selected interaction per predator–prey species pair per published source.

FIG. A1. Results of a meta-analysis using log response ratio effect sizes to examine the effect of predator hunting mode and predator habitat domain on the strength of non-consumptive effects for a variety of prey response metrices. For papers in which the same predator–prey species pair was measured under different conditions (i.e., high vs. low predator density), a single interaction was randomly chosen for analysis. Mean effect sizes were generated using a random-effects model, and a bootstrapping routine was used to generate the accompanying 95% confidence intervals. Numbers in parentheses at the base of each bar represent the number of published papers (regular text) and the number of independent experiments ( |

LITERATURE CITED

Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57:289–300.