Ecological Archives E088-048-A1

Marcus Aström, Mats Dynesius, Kristoffer Hylander, and Christer Nilsson. 2007. Slope aspect modifies community responses to clear-cutting in boreal forests. Ecology 88:749–758.

Appendix A. A table of habitat properties of forests and clear–cuts in south– and north–facing slopes and their correlations with NMS site scores and potential annual direct radiation.

TABLE A1. Habitat properties of forests and clear-cuts in south- and north-facing slopes and their correlations with NMS site scores and potential annual direct radiation (PAR). Data are mean values of ten plots with ranges in parentheses. Plot size is 200 m2. n.a. = not available.


     

Forest

 

Clear-cut

 

Correlations

     

South facing

North facing

 

South facing

North facing

 

Axis 1

Axis 2

PAR


Slope and plot variables

                 
 

Aspect (°; 180° = S)

189 (125–230)

8 (325–64)

 

195 (120–230)

18 (340 – 50)

 

 

Inclination (°)

31 (22–41)

34 (25–41)

 

30 (20–38)

32 (24–43)

 

 

Potential annual direct radiation (PAR; MJ cm-2 yr-1)

0.78 (0.69–0.87)

0.24 (0.17–0.38)

 

0.74 (0.68–0.84)

0.26 (0.19–0.34)

 

0.13

0.74**

1.00

 

Distance to nearest edge (m)

51 (25–116)

48 (25–143)

 

91 (26–221)

79 (35–175)

 

-0.24

0.05

0.04

 

Distance to valley bottom (m)

19 (11–48)

16 (11–33)

 

17 (11–42)

19 (11–40)

 

0.15

0.00

-0.05

 

Distance to ridge top (m)

21 (11–30)

17 (11–28)

 

20 (12–25)

15 (10–22)

 

0.16

0.54**

0.44**

Forest structure

 
       
 

Stand or clear–cut age (yr)

107 (80–134)

107 (80–134)

 

11 (3–22)

11 (3–22)

 

0.45**

-0.27

0.01

 

All trees

 
 
       
   

Number of trees per plot

19 (5–32)

23 (14–46)

 

3 (0–22)

1 (0–3)

 

0.44**

-0.14

0.05

   

Basal area (m2/ha)

22 (18–29)

19 (14–24)

 

1 (0–9)

0 (0–4)

 

0.46**

-0.19

0.09

   

Canopy cover (m2)

n.a.

n.a.

 

n.a.

n.a.

 

 

Pine

 
       
   

Number of trees per plot

2 (0–6)

1 (0–3)

 

2 (0–17)

0 (0–0)

 

0.18

0.06

0.26

   

Basal area (m2/ha)

4 (0–10)

3 (0–8)

 

1 (0–6)

0 (0–0)

 

0.22

-0.04

0.12

   

Canopy cover (m2)

16 (0–41)

8 (0–28)

 

7 (0–48)

0 (0–4)

 

0.06

0.19

0.36*

 

Spruce

 
       
   

Number of trees per plot

11 (3–23)

18 (12–30)

 

1 (0–3)

0 (0–1)

 

0.37*

-0.28

-0.06

   

Basal area (m2/ha)

13 (7–22)

13 (11–19)

 

0 (0–1)

0 (0–1)

 

0.38*

-0.35*

-0.05

   

Canopy cover (m2)

91 (21–152)

121 (83–152)

 

8 (0–31)

6 (0–23)

 

0.42**

-0.29

-0.09

 

Broadleaves

 
       
   

Number of trees per plot

6 (0–19)

4 (0–24)

 

0 (0–3)

0 (0–2)

 

0.57**

0.16

0.37*

   

Basal area (m2/ha)

5 (0–16)

2 (0–9)

 

0 (0–3)

0 (0–3)

 

0.54**

-0.07

0.23

   

Canopy cover (m2)

39 (0–78)

23 (0–92)

 

28 (1–74)

20 (0–39)

 

0.28

0.41**

0.37*

Substrates (m2)

 
       
 

FWD

6 (4–9)

5 (1–14)

 

17 (8–34)

10 (1–27)

 

-0.13

0.57**

0.45**

 

CWD

1.6 (0.2–3.1)

1.3 (0.2–3.2)

 

1.8 (1.1–3.2)

1.7 (0.8–2.7)

 

0.36*

0.13

0.09

 

Litter + humus + mineral soil

8 (0–17)

3 (0–15)

 

10 (1–32)

0 (0–1)

 

0.26

0.63**

0.70**


Notes: Correlations are Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Aspect and inclination were not tested as they are synthesized in PAR. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).



[Back to E088–048]