Ecological Archives E087-023-A2

Lisa A. Levin, Carlos Neira, and Edwin D. Grosholz. 2006. Invasive cordgrass modifies wetland trophic function. Ecology 87:419–432.

Appendix B. Estimated proportion of Spartina hybrid and other food sources in macrofaunal diets based on natural abundance stable isotope data. Results are derived from application of 2 source and 3-source concentration-dependent mixing models (Phillips and Koch 2002). See main article for methods.


 

TIDAL FLAT
2 source model*
(C only)

HYBRID SPARTINA
3 source model**
(C and N)

 
Proportion
Biomass Proportion
 

 

Spartina/Ulva

POM/SOM/Diatom

Spartina

Cyano/Ulva

 



Corophium sp.

0.46

     

Traskorchestia traskiana

0.82

0.57

0.22

0.21

Urosalpinx  cinerea

0.61

0.8

0.20

0

Nassarius obsoleta

1.00

     

Venerupis philippinarum

0.04

0.56

0.00

0.44

Mya arenaria

0.60

     

Gemma gemma

0.55

     

Capitella sp.

1.00

0.01

0.44

0.54

Eteone dilatae

1.00

0.15

0.30

0.54

Eteone californica

1.00

     

Nereis succinea

1.00

0.78

0.21

0.00

Tharyx sp.

1.00

     

Polydora cornuta

1.00

     

Streblospio benedicti

0.59

     

Unid. Sponge

0.00

0.83

0.17

0.00

Gnorimosphaeroma sp.

-

0.48

0.52

0.00

Geukensia demissus

-

0.82

0.00

0.18

Boccardia sp.

-

0.00

0.23

 0.77

Exogone sp.

-

     

Tubificidae

-

0.48

0.00

0.52

Balanus glandula

-

     

Hemigrapsus oregonensis

-

     

Carcinus maenas

-

0.65

0.35

0


*Spartina/Ulva vs. POM/SOM/Diatom  

** Spartina vs. Cyanobacteria+Ulva vs POM/SOM/Diatoms

 

LITERATURE CITED

Phillips, D. L., and P. L. Koch. 2002. Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models. Oecologia 130:114–125.



[Back to E087-023]