The modifications necessary when
the two species have different mean lifetimes are very simple. If the lifetimes
are close or the fluctuations in
(as
opposed to the fluctuations in recruitment) are small, then it remains true
that
|
and the species with the smaller mean recruitment exhibits the larger fractional recruitment fluctuations. Since
|
the species with the smaller product of death rate and abundance fluctuates more. Equation (2) (which is the same as Eq. A.7) takes the more general form
|
(B.1)
|
It may be difficult to extract the
value of
with any precision in
the presence of recruitment fluctuations, but we can illustrate the potential
effects of unequal lifetime by reference to Jatropha (Kelly et al. 2001).
In these data J. chamelensis is commoner than J. standleyi but
the difference is not really significant. The measured growth rate of J.
standleyi is greater than that of J. chamelensis but again the errors
are such that the difference is not very significant. However, the mean age
of the trees in the J. chamelensis sample is about half that of the J.
standleyi sample growing under comparable conditions, and if this difference
reflects the underlying exponentials (which is by no means certain) then
.
Then
for approximately equal
populations and the growth rate divided by the death rate is much larger for
J. standleyi (the "rarer"). Such considerations should be
borne in mind with real data.
Kelly, C. K., H. Banyard Smith, Y. M. Buckley, R. Carter, M. Franco, W. Johnson, T. Jones, B. May, R. Perez Ishiwara, A. Perez-Jimenez, A. Solis Magallanes, H. Steers, and C. Waterman. 2001. Investigations in commonness and rarity: a comparative analysis of co-occuring, congeneric Mexican trees. Ecology Letters 4:618627.