Ecological Archives E086-050-A7

**Christopher C. Caudill. 2005. Trout predators and demographic sources and sinks in a mayfly metapopulation. Ecology 86:935–946.**

Appendix G (Table G1). A table showing results of linear contrasts testing for differences in _i among trout density manipulation treatments.

Treatment Contrast

F_{1, 8}

P

Fishless Control (n = 3) vs. Introduction (3)

1.362

0.277

Introduction (3) vs. Reduction (3)

0.571

0.471

Fishless Control (3) vs. All Trout Ponds (9)

3.022

0.120

Results Excluding Bellview

F_1,7

P

Fishless Control (n = 3) vs. Introduction (3)

3.317

0.111

Introduction (3) vs. Reduction (3)

0.002

0.968

Fishless Control (3) vs. All Trout Ponds (9)

4.639

0.068

Note: Overall ANOVA F_3,8 = 1.261, P = 0.351, n = 12; excluding Bellview Overall ANOVA F_3,7 = 1.776, P = 0.239, n = 11.

[Back to E086-050]

Treatment Contrast	F_{1, 8}	P
Fishless Control (n = 3) vs. Introduction (3)	1.362	0.277
Introduction (3) vs. Reduction (3)	0.571	0.471
Fishless Control (3) vs. All Trout Ponds (9)	3.022	0.120

Results Excluding Bellview	F_1,7	P
Fishless Control (n = 3) vs. Introduction (3)	3.317	0.111
Introduction (3) vs. Reduction (3)	0.002	0.968
Fishless Control (3) vs. All Trout Ponds (9)	4.639	0.068