Ecological Archives E086-026-A1

Evan L. Preisser, Daniel I. Bolnick, and Michael F. Benard. 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509.

Appendix A. A summary of data gathered from papers used in this meta-analysis.

For each study, we provide a reference (see Appendix B for full citations), a list of the taxa involved, a brief summary of the trait-mediated interaction (TMI), details about the study system (ecosystem, food chain length, TMI mechanism, and whether or not TMI and density-mediated interaction (DMI) effects were in opposite directions), and experimental methods (experimental scale, experimental duration, what effects were reported in the original reference, and what variable was measured). We provide the magnitude of trait-mediated effects relative to total predator effects (the response ratio), the log response ratio used for statistical analysis, and the variance of the log response ratio. The number of experimental treatment replicates, and the number of individuals within each treatment replicate (where available) are provided separately. Finally, we document the source of our data from the relevant reference.

TABLE A1. A summary of studies used for meta-analysis of trait-mediated effect sizes.

Reference no.
Reference
Primary predator
Secondary predator§
Prey
Resource
TMI description
Ecosystem
Scale
Duration (days)
Food chain length
Mechanism of TMI
Measured effects
Opposing TMI and DMI?
Measured variable
Relative TMI effect (RR)
ln(abs(RR)+1)
Variance
Number of replicates
Individuals per replicate
Data source
1 Beckerman et al. (1997) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum,
red-legged grasshopper
  Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in the presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grasshopper density 0.6667 0.5108 1.1285 20 8 Table 1
2 Blaustein (1997) Salamandra infraimmaculata,
fire salamander
  Arctodiaptomus similis, calanoid copepod   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0022 5 n/a Fig. 1
2 Blaustein (1997)     Ceriodaphnia quadrangula, cladocera   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 0.9885 0.6874 0.1144 5 n/a Fig. 2
2 Blaustein (1997) Salamandra infraimmaculata,
fire salamander
  Cyzicus sp., clam shrimp   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 0.9325 0.6588 0.0060 5 n/a Fig. 1
3 Brodin and Johansson (2002) Perca fluviatilis,
perch
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
  Perch reduce damselfly foraging behavior; non-lethal perch do not. freshwater field 150 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no number of prey emerging as adults 0.0237 0.0234 2.8142 6, 12 33 Text, p. 319
3 Brodin and Johansson (2002) Perca fluviatilis,
perch
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
Perch reduce damselfly foraging behavior; non-lethal perch do not. freshwater field 150 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes zooplankton density 0.0243 0.0240 12.8879 6 n/a Fig. 1
4 Crowder et al. (1997) wading birds Paralichthys lethostigma,
southern flounder
Leiostomus xanthurus,
spot
  Predatory birds cause spot to aggregate making them harder for flounder to catch. marine field 15 two-level predator inhibition DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality of spot 0.9636 0.6748 0.0003 4 395 Table 2
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Baetis rhodani,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0001 0.0001 2500.0016 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Leuctra sp.,
stonefly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0015 0.0015 2500.2402 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Pacifastacus leniusculus,
signal crayfish
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0001 0.0001 2500.0509 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Limnephilidae, caddisfly   Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0006 0.0006 2500.0204 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Gammarus pulex,
isopod
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.5957 0.4673 0.0148 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Baetis rhodani,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0010 0.0010 2500.0297 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
6 Diehl et al. (2000) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Baetis bicaudatus,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 66 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no emigration and mortality rates 0.3000 0.2624 0.5883 6 n/a Fig. 4
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Culiseta longiareolata,
mosquito
  Mosquitoes avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 11 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of larvae and pupae surviving 0.4599 0.3783 0.0004 6 45 Fig. 1
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Culiseta laticinctus,
mosquito
  Mosquitoes avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 11 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of larvae and pupae surviving 0.4925 0.4004 0.0383 6 30 Fig. 2
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Forcipomyia sp.,
fly
  Flies avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of pupae surviving 3.5610 1.5175 0.6039 6 n/a Fig. 3
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Chironomus riparius,
midge
  Midges avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of pupal exuviae 1.0428 0.7143 0.1038 6 n/a Fig. 4
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Daphnia sp.   Daphnia eggs enter diapause in presence of predator freshwater field 22 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no daphnia density 0.7210 0.5429 0.0202 6 n/a Fig. 5
8 Eklöv and Van Kooten (2001) Esox lucius,
pike
Perca fluviatilis,
perch
Rutilus rutilus,
roach
  Increased mortality of roach caused by perch facilitation of pike. freshwater field 130 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no roach mortality 0.2055 0.1869 0.0117 5 80 Fig. 1A
9 Eklöv and Werner (2000) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 1 (smallest)   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.2509 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 1 (smallest)   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.0267 0.0263 0.1034 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 2   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0005 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 2   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 50000.0000 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 3   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0055 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 3   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 4   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0009 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 4   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 5   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0205 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 5   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 1 (smallest)   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.4800 0.3920 0.0838 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 1 (smallest)   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 8 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.6014 0.4708 0.0063 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 2   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 1.5063 0.9188 0.0096 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 2   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.1103 0.1047 0.0165 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 3   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 4.2000 1.6487 0.3096 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 3   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2362 0.2120 0.0569 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 4   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2439 0.2183 0.2031 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 4   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2442 0.2185 0.0420 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 5   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 4 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0056 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 5   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0160 4 10 Fig. 1
11 Feltmate and Williams (1989) Oncorhynchus mykiss,
rainbow trout
  Paragnetina media,
stonefly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 4 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no stonefly density 0.5746 0.4540 0.0725 3 n/a Fig. 2
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 28 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes amphipod density 2.3931 1.2217 12.1040 4 n/a Fig. 6A
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 28 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes amphipod density 0.5947 0.4667 90.2204 4 n/a Fig. 6B
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine lab 6 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod mortality 0.7863 0.5802 0.0006 9 200 Fig. 4
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine lab 6 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod mortality 0.8883 0.6357 0.0019 9 200 Fig. 4
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Multiple predators   Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 21 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod density 0.5283 0.4242 0.0004 6 200 Fig. 8
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Multiple predators   Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 21 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod density 0.5872 0.4619 0.0024 6 200 Fig. 8
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8666 0.6241 0.6623 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.9461 0.6658 0.2579 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Paraleptophlebia sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.9212 0.6530 1.0184 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Paraleptophlebia sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8002 0.5879 0.6858 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Ephemerella sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8764 0.6293 0.9440 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Ephemerella sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI yes percent drifting; percent consumed 1.4653 0.9023 12.2114 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Eurylophella sp.,
Mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.2500 0.2231 91.3961 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Eurylophella sp.,
Mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI yes percent drifting; percent consumed 1.2071 0.7917 0.6533 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Stenonema sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.3576 0.3057 0.3219 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Stenonema sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.1422 0.1330 0.3741 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Large-sized Poecilia reticulata,
guppy
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.9380 0.6617 0.0043 4 8 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Small-sized Poecilia reticulata,
guppy
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.6006 0.4704 0.0595 4 8 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Large-sized Rivulus hartii,
jumping guabine
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.6921 0.5260 0.0773 4 4 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Small-sized Rivulus hartii,
jumping guabine
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.7504 0.5598 0.0077 4 8 Table 1
15 Grabowski, In Press Opsanus tau,
oyster toadfish
  Panopeus herbstii,
mud crab
Crassostrea virginica,
oyster
Prey hide from predators, lowering feeding rate marine lab 6 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total no percent oyster mortality 0.9820 0.6841 0.0008 5 40 Fig. 2
15 Grabowski, In Press Opsanus tau,
oyster toadfish
  Panopeus herbstii,
mud crab
Crassostrea virginica,
oyster
Prey hide from predators, lowering feeding rate marine lab 7 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total yes percent oyster mortality 0.9560 0.6709 0.0013 5 40 Fig. 2
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Gonyostomum semen,
algae
  Algae reduce recruitment rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.6674 0.5113 0.0073 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Gonyostomum semen,
algae
  Algae reduce recruitment rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.0313 0.0308 6.6198 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Anabaena sp.,
algae
  Anabaena benefits from predator presence because of reduced competition from other algae that have delayed recruitment freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.0744 0.0718 0.0179 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9228 0.6538 0.0001 3 12595 Table 1, 'High'
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9350 0.6601 0.0001 3 4189 Table 1, 'Medium'
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9389 0.6621 0.0001 3 1303 Table 1, 'Low'
18 Kelly et al. (2002) Salmo salar,
salmon
Gammarus duebeni,
amphipod
Baetis rhodani, mayfly   Carnivorous amphipod Gammarus duebeni celticus increases drift of mayfly nymphs, thereby increasing contact with predatory salmon. freshwater lab 0.125 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of Baetis eaten by salmon 0.9736 0.6798 0.0046 12 10 Fig. 6
18 Kelly et al. (2002) Salmo salar,
salmon
Gammarus duebeni,
amphipod
Baetis rhodani, mayfly   Carnivorous amphipod Gammarus pulex increases drift of mayfly nymphs, thereby increasing contact with predatory salmon. freshwater lab 0.125 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of Baetis eaten by salmon 0.9729 0.6795 0.0094 12 10 Fig. 6
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.2449 0.2191 0.0057 2 100 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.6506 0.5011 0.0001 2 200 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.5328 0.4271 0.0001 2 300 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.3035 0.2650 0.0012 2 400 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.2586 0.2300 0.0002 2 800 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.5275 0.4236 0.0001 2 1600 Fig. 3
20 Lancaster (1990) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total no daily per capita mortality and drift 5.0857 1.8059 0.0533 10 n/a Table 3, Fig. 3A
20 Lancaster (1990) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Chironomidae, flies