Appendix A. Tables of separate generalized linear models (GLIM) analyses for each species and for seed types of Pectocarya heterocarpa.
Table A1. Separate GLIM analyses for each species.
| Species |
Trial date
|
Germination
conditions
|
Summer pre-treatment
|
Trial × germ.
cond.
|
Trial × summer
|
Germ. cond. × summer
|
Three-way
interaction
|
| Eriastrum diffusum |
F = 42.09***
df = 4, 243 (11.93) |
F = 17.65***
df = 2, 243 (5.00) |
F = 47.74***
df = 2, 243 (13.53) |
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
| Eriophyllum lanosum |
F = 26.58***
df = 4, 269 (6.02) |
F = 75.34***
df = 2, 269 (17.06) |
F = 53.24***
df = 2, 269 (12.06) |
NS
|
F = 3.25**
df = 8, 269 (5.8) |
NS
|
NS
|
| Evax multicaulis |
F = 81.24***
df = 4, 251 (6.35) |
F = 194.74***
df = 2, 251 (15.21) |
F = 36.47***
df = 2, 251 (2.85) |
F = 39.93***
df = 8, 251 (3.11) |
F = 90.26***
df = 7, 251 (7.05) |
F = 43.85***
df = 4, 251 (3.43) |
F = 24.31***
df = 14, 251 (1.90) |
| Pectocarya hetercarpa, winged seeds |
F = 8.55***
df = 4, 269 (0.80) |
F = 194.8***
df = 2, 269 (18.26) |
F = 13.38***
df = 2, 269 (1.25) |
F = 93.52***
df = 8, 269 (8.76) |
F = 68.70***
df = 8, 269 (6.44) |
F = 45.96*** |
NS
|
| Pectocarya hetercarpa, long seeds |
F = 22.84***
df = 4, 269 (4.15) |
F = 139.83***
df = 2, 269 (25.41) |
F = 14.47***
df = 2, 269 (2.63) |
NS
|
F = 23.61***
df = 8, 269 (4.29) |
NS
|
NS
|
| Pectocarya recurvata |
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
| Plantago patagonica |
F = 275.12***
df = 4, 263 (13.22) |
F = 151.97***
df = 2,263 (7.30) |
F = 167.58***
df = 2, 263 (8.05) |
F = 119.78***
df = 8, 263 (5.75) |
F = 160.77***
df = 8, 263 (7.72) |
F = 40.63***
df = 4, 263 (1.95) |
NS
|
| Schismus barbatus |
F = 118.01***
df = 4, 222 (10.51) |
NS
|
F = 65.69***
df = 2, 222 (5.85) |
F = 73.42***
df = 8, 222 (6.54) |
F = 49.80***
df = 6, 222 (4.43) |
NS
|
F = 100.05***
df = 16, 222 (8.91) |
| Stylocline micropoides |
F = 2.06
df = 4, 267 |
F = 58.15***
df = 2, 267 (13.26) |
F = 5.18**
df = 2, 267 (1.18) |
F = 19.95***
df = 8, 267 (18.24) |
F = 4.25***
df = 8, 267 (3.90) |
F = 3.64*
df = 4, 267 (1.67) |
F = 2.69*
df = 15, 267 (4.60) |
Notes: Results of the analysis for each species is given individually. Degrees of freedom is given first for the source and then for the total. Percentage explained is the percentage of the total deviance explained by each variable.
*P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.0005
Table A2. Results of the analysis of P. heterocarpa seed types.
| Source |
Percentage
explained
|
df
|
F
value
|
| Seed type |
14.6
|
1
|
416.2
|
| Germ. conditions |
27.7
|
2
|
393.7
|
| Trial date |
2.5
|
4
|
18.8
|
| Summer treatment |
3.1
|
2
|
44.6
|
| Type × germ cond. |
3.9
|
2
|
55.3
|
| Type × trial date |
0.2
|
4
|
NS 1.1
|
| Type × summer |
0.9
|
2
|
13.8
|
| Germ. cond. × trial date |
9.4
|
8
|
33.4
|
| Germ. cond. × summer |
5.6
|
4
|
40.0
|
| Trial date × summer |
3.3
|
8
|
11.8
|
| Type × germ. cond. × trial date |
1.7
|
8
|
6.0
|
| Type × germ. cond. × summer |
1.4
|
4
|
10.0
|
| Type × trial date × summer |
1.1
|
8
|
3.8
|
| Germ. cond. × trial date × summer |
3.6
|
16
|
6.5
|
| Type × germ. cond. × trial date × summer |
2.1
|
15
|
4.0
|
| Error |
15.9
|
451
|
Notes: Percentage explained is the percentage of the total variation (sum of squares) explained by each effect. P < 0.0005 for all effects except seed type × trial, which was not significant (P > 0.3).