Appendix C. ANOVAs testing the effects of (A) month of fruit maturation on the proportion of fruits removed and (B) bagging treatment (i.e., exposed vs. bagged fruits) and month of fruit maturation on fruit retention time. See Fig. 7 in text for data summary.
|
|
Llao-Llao |
Península |
||||||
|
Source |
df |
SS |
F |
P |
df |
SS |
F |
P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A) Proportion of fruits removed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
1997/ 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
7 |
7.344 |
21.49 |
<0.0001 |
7 |
3.517 |
7.62 |
<0.0001 |
|
Plant |
19 |
1.536 |
1.66 |
0.065 |
14 |
2.361 |
2.56 |
0.0062 |
|
Error |
72 |
3.514 |
|
|
59 |
3.891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998/ 99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
6 |
3.999 |
8.93 |
<0.0001 |
6 |
3.019 |
9.42 |
<0.0001 |
|
Plant |
22 |
3.097 |
1.89 |
0.019 |
17 |
5.026 |
5.53 |
<0.0001 |
|
Error |
90 |
6.718 |
|
|
74 |
3.953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Fruit retention time (wk) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
1997/ 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
1 |
227.46 |
40.73 |
<0.0001 |
1 |
217.61 |
48.74 |
<0.0001 |
|
Month |
7 |
130.08 |
3.33 |
0.0029 |
7 |
153.27 |
4.90 |
<0.0001 |
|
Month × treatment |
7 |
250.97 |
6.42 |
<0.0001 |
7 |
57.83 |
1.85 |
0.085 |
|
Plant |
19 |
103.31 |
0.97 |
0.49 |
14 |
88.64 |
1.42 |
0.16 |
|
Error |
118 |
658.98 |
|
|
102 |
455.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998/ 99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
1 |
256.23 |
32.55 |
<0.0001 |
1 |
879.26 |
84.88 |
<0.0001 |
|
Month |
6 |
354.31 |
7.50 |
<0.0001 |
6 |
144.48 |
2.32 |
0.036 |
|
Month × treatment |
6 |
123.77 |
2.62 |
0.019 |
6 |
85.15 |
1.37 |
0.23 |
|
Plant |
22 |
708.00 |
4.09 |
<0.0001 |
17 |
357.07 |
2.03 |
0.013 |
|
Error |
159 |
1251.60 |
|
|
136 |
1408.77 |
|
|
Notes: Because data sets were not completely balanced, F values were estimated from Type III sums of squares (SAS 1988). Individual plant was included as a blocking factor.
Literature cited
SAS. 1988. SAS/STAT user's Guide. Release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA