Ecological Archives A021-148-A2

Cory R. Davis and Andrew J. Hansen. 2011. Trajectories in land-use change around US National Parks and their challenges and opportunities for management. Ecological Applications 21:3298–3315.

Appendix B. A table describing the criteria used to delineate protected-area centered ecosystems and the ecological mechanisms on which they are based, and a table summarizing the known impacts of land-use changes on ecological processes.

TABLE B1. Criteria used to delineate protected-area-centered ecosystem boundaries and the ecological mechanisms on which they are based. The mechanisms are means by which human activities on surrounding lands may alter ecological processes and/or the viability of native species within protected areas as described by Hansen and DeFries (2007).

Mechanism Ecological Effects PACE Delineation criterion PACE data used
in this study
Change in
ecological
flows into
and out of
protected
area
Water, sediment, nutrients, and organisms move with water
flows through watersheds. Land use in upper watersheds
may alter these flows into protected area.
Watershed boundaries: subbasins,
watersheds, or subwatersheds
intersecting protected area.
8, 10, and 12-digit
HUCs intersecting
protected area
(USDA-NRCS 2008)
Disturbances (e.g. fire) may originate outside and move
through a protected area. The condition of the disturbance
initiation zone influences the likelihood of disturbance
moving into the protected area. Both the disturbance
initiation and runout zones may provide important habitat
for organisms in the protected area.
Perimeter around protected area
of potential disturbance initiation
and runout zones based on historic
disturbance size and shape.
None
Loss of
crucial
habitats
Seasonal habitats, population source areas, movement paths,
or portions of large home ranges for populations within
protected areas may lie outside the protected areas. Land
use may alter or destroy these crucial habitats.
Migration, source-sink, and
seasonal habitats of
protected-area based organisms.
None
Change in
effective
size of
reserve
Species within a protected area can be lost due to isolation as
the area of surrounding habitats is reduced due to land use.
Habitat types in proportional
representation up to size
specified from species-area
relationship.
LANDFIRE
Existing Vegetation
Type layer (U.S.
Department of
Interior 2008)
Human
edge
effects
Human presence on the periphery of protected areas may
cause changes in ecosystem processes and biodiversity that
extend varying distances into the protected area (e.g.,
hunting, poaching, outdoor recreation, pet effects on
wildlife, exotic species).
Private lands within 25-km buffer
around protected area.
All private,
non-protected
land within
25 km buffer
(Theobald
unpubl. data)

TABLE B2. Known impacts of land-use changes on ecological systems.

Variable Reason for inclusion/effects References
Land
ownership
Amount of public land influences the intactness of the larger ecosystem
depending on the level of protection; amount of private land determines
the potential for agriculture or other human development; private land
is susceptible to extractive resource markets such as timber and amenity
driven markets such as housing
Turner et al. 1996
Population
density
Strongly correlated with adverse effects on species survival due to:
poaching, disease spread and competition from pets or livestock,
increases in exotic species, increases in human-wildlife conflicts,
and loss of habitat from preferential human settlement patterns
Kerr and Currie 1995,
Brashares et al. 2001,
Parks and Harcourt 2002,
Revilla et al. 2001, Packer et al. 1999,
Young et al. 2005, McKinney 2001,
Newmark et al. 1994,
Hansen and Rotella 2002
Housing
density
Recent, rapid increases in housing both at urban fringes and in
rural settings, with particularly high rates around protected areas;
highly correlated with aspects of ecosystem function and biodiversity;
effects include: reduction in the overall size of the effective
ecosystem, intensification of edge effects, interruption of linkages
between habitats used as dispersal or migration routes, introduction
of exotic species, and disruption of flows of energy and disturbance
events; associated with new roads, potentially harmful pets,
recreation, and wildlife-human conflicts
Theobald 2001, Brown et al. 2005,
Wade and Theobald 2010,
Radeloff et al 2010,
Hansen et al. 2005,
Hansen and DeFries 2007,
Crooks and Soule 1999,
Boyle and Samson 1985
Land in
agriculture
Loss of natural habitat; creates barriers to movement of native
species; creates population sinks along borders of protected areas;
increases spread of invasive plant species; reduces water and air
quality due to pesticides and fertilizers; conversion of former
agricultural land to low density housing may change the available
forage for some species and create more severe barriers to
organism movement
Sinclair et al. 2002,
Pauchard and Alaback 2004,
Kramer and Doran 2010
Impervious
surfaces
Expected to double by 2030; measure of water quality; protected
areas located lower in a watershed are dependent on water
quality and quantity from upstream
Allan 2004, Jantz et al. 2005,
Theobald et al. 2009
Area of
roads
Direct mortality to organisms; barriers to species movements;
fragmentation of habitat; noise; spread of invasive
and non-native species
Forman and Alexander 2000,
Ament et al. 2008

LITERATURE CITED

Allan, J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35:257–284.

Ament, R., A. P. Clevenger, O. Yu, and A. Hardy. 2008. An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in US National Parks. Environmental Management 42:480–496.

Boyle, S. A., and F. B. Samson. 1985. Effects of nonconsumptive recreation on wildlife: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13:110–116.

Brashares, J. S., P. Arcese, and M. K. Sam. 2001. Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 2473–2478.

Brown, D. G., K. M. Johnson, T. R. Loveland, and D. M. Theobald. 2005. Rural land use trends in the conterminous US, 1950-2000. Ecological Applications 15: 1851–1863.

Crooks, K. R., and M. E. Soulé. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566.

Forman, R. T. T, and L. E. Alexander. 2000. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207–231.

Hansen, A. J., and R. DeFries. 2007. Ecological mechanisms linking nature reserves to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications 17:974–988.

Hansen, A. J., and J. J. Rotella. 2002. Biophysical factors, land use, and species viability in and around nature reserves. Conservation Biology 16:1–12.

Hansen, A. J., R. Knight, J. Marzluff, S. Powell, K. Brown, P. Hernandez, and K. Jones. 2005. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, research needs. Ecological Applications 15: 1893–1905.

Jantz, P., S. Goetz, and C. Jantz. 2005. Urbanization and the loss of resource lands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Management 36:808–825.

Kerr, J. T., and D. J. Currie. 1995. Effects of human activity on global extinction risk. Conservation Biology 9:1528–1538.

Kramer, D. B., and P. J. Doran. 2010. Land conversion at the protected area’s edge. Conservation Letters 3:349–358.

McKinney, M. L. 2001. Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biological Conservation 100:243–252.

Newmark, W. D., D. N. Manyanza, D-G. M. Gamassa, and H. I. Sariko. 1994. The conflict between wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania. Conservation Biology 8:249–255.

Packer, C., S. Altizer, M. Appel, E. Brown, J. Martenson, S. J. O’Brien, M. Roelke-Parker, R. Hofmann-Lehman, and H. Lutz. 1999. Viruses of the Serengeti: patterns of infection and mortality in African lions. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:1161–1178.

Parks, S. A., and A. H. Harcourt. 2002. Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in the US protected areas. Conservation Biology 16:800–808.

Pauchard, A., and P. B. Alaback. 2004. Influence of elevation, land use, and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of south-central Chile. Conservation Biology 18:238–248.

Radeloff, V. C., S. I. Stewart, T. J. Hawbaker, U. Gimmi, A. M. Pidgeon, C.H. Flather, R. B. Hammer, and D. P. Helmers. 2010. Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:940–945.

Revilla, E., F. Palomares, and M. Delibes. 2001. Edge-core effects and the effectiveness of traditional reserves in conservation: Eurasian badgers in Doñana National Park. Conservation Biology 15:148–158.

Sinclair, A. R. E., S. A. R. Mduma, and P. Arcese. 2002. Protected areas as biodiversity benchmarks for human impact: agriculture and the Serengeti avifauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society 269:2401–2405.

Theobald, D. M. 2001. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geographical Review 91:544–564.

Theobald, D. M., S. J. Goetz, J. B. Norman, and P. Jantz. 2009. Watersheds at risk to increased impervious surface cover in conterminous United States. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 14:362–368.

Turner, M. G., D. N. Wear, and R.O. Flamm. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications 6:1150–1172.

U.S. Department of Agriculture – Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2008. Watershed Boundary Dataset. Accessed July, 2008. (http://datgateway.nrcs.usda.gov).

U.S. Department of Interior (DOI). 2008. The National Map LANDFIRE: LANDFIRE National Existing Vegetation Type layer. U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. Accessed June – December 2008. (http://gisdata.usgs.net/website/landfire/).

Wade, A. A., and D. M. Theobald. 2010. Residential development encroachment on US protected areas. Conservation Biology 24:151–161.

Young, T. P., T. M. Palmer, and M. E. Gadd. 2005. Competition and compensation among cattle, zebras, and elephants in a semi-arid savanna in Laikipia, Kenya. Biological Conservation 122:351–359.


[Back to A021-148]