Ecological Archives A015-019-A2

Peter B. Adler, Daniel G. Milchunus, Osvaldo E. Sala, Ingrid C. Burke, and William K. Lauenroth. 2005. Plant traits and ecosystem grazing effects: comparison of U.S. sagebrush steppe and Patagonian steppe. Ecological Applications 15:774–792.

Appendix B. Statistical tables for single-year mixed-effects models. See Notes at end of tables for details.

Dependent
variable

Independent
variables

Num df

Den df

F

P

 

A) Forage consumption

 

region

1

34

11.31

0.002

 

ppt

2

34

0.93

0.40

 

region × ppt

2

34

1.28

0.29

 

distance

2

34

5.63

0.008

 

region × distance

2

34

6.39

0.004

 

ppt × distance

4

34

2.96

0.036

 

region × ppt × distance

4

34

6.47

0.0006

   
 
 
 
 

B) Forage utilization

 

region

1

47

6.07

0.017

 

ppt

2

47

1.78

0.18

 

distance

1

47

7.94

0.007

   
 
 
 
 

C) Perennial grass basal cover

 

region

1

16.5

7.76

0.013

 

ppt

2

12.5

0.80

0.47

 

region × ppt

2

12.1

5.86

0.017

 

distance

3

74.4

18.29

<0.0001

 

region × distance

3

74.2

0.24

0.87

 

ppt × distance

5

73

3.28

0.010

 

region × ppt × distance

4

72.6

2.37

0.061

   
 
 
 
 

D) Perennial grass above-ground production (log transformed)

 

region

1

13

2.45

0.14

 

ppt

2

12.1

4.74

0.030

 

region × ppt

2

12.2

15.87

<0.001

 

distance

3

34.7

10.55

<0.0001

 

region × distance

3

34.6

1.91

0.15

 

ppt × distance

5

33.3

1.01

0.42

 

region × ppt × distance

4

33.1

2.64

0.051

   
 
 
 
 

E) Shrub canopy cover (square root transformed)

 

region

1

11.4

7.14

0.021

 

ppt

2

11.3

3.93

0.051

 

region × ppt

2

11.3

9.51

0.004

 

distance

3

85.4

4.86

0.004

   
 
 
 
 

F) Shrub aboveground production (log transformed)

 

region

1

52

33.08

<0.0001

 

ppt

2

52

1.95

0.15

 

region × ppt

2

52

12.27

<0.0001

 

distance

3

52

1.33

0.27

   
 
 
 
 

G) Forb aboveground production (log transformed)

 

region

1

16.1

1.73

0.21

 

ppt

2

12.2

8.19

0.006

 

region × ppt

2

11.9

11.86

0.002

 

distance

3

31.4

2.40

0.087

 

region × distance

3

30.5

8.28

<0.001

 

ppt × distance

5

30.2

2.16

0.085

 

region × ppt × distance

4

30.9

2.95

0.036

 

radiation

1

34.1

6.37

0.016

   
 
 
 
 

H) Total aboveground production

 

region

1

18.3

0.99

0.33

 

ppt

2

12.4

12.58

0.001

 

region × ppt

2

12.4

3.55

0.060

 

distance

3

42.6

3.17

0.034

 

region × distance

3

42.1

2.84

0.049

 

radiation

1

36.8

3.92

0.055

   
 
 
 
 

I) Mean species richness per 1-m2 quadrat

 

region

1

13.9

0.00

0.97

 

ppt

2

13.8

36.17

<0.0001

 

distance

3

82.7

2.24

0.089

   
 
 
 
 

J) Species richness per site (sum across 24 1-m2 quadrats)

 

region

1

12.5

15.70

0.002

 

ppt

2

12.4

70.80

<0.0001

 

region × ppt

2

12.4

5.97

0.015

 

distance

3

85.8

0.67

0.58

   
 
 
 
 

K) Non-native species richness per site  (sum across 24 1-m2 quadrats)

 

region

1

11.5

10.01

0.009

 

ppt

2

11.5

25.83

<0.0001

 

region × ppt

2

11.4

7.20

<0.001

 

distance

3

83.8

6.83

<0.001

   
 
 
 
 

L) Soil C (log transformed)

 

region

1

49.9

4.52

0.038

 

ppt

2

12.2

45.12

<0.0001

 

region × ppt

2

11.9

4.77

0.030

 

sand

1

52.3

9.90

<0.003

   
 
 
 
 

M) Soil N (log transformed)

 

region

1

49.9

2.88

0.100

 

ppt

2

12.8

41.11

<0.0001

 

region × ppt

2

12.4

5.10

0.024

 

sand

1

53.9

13.28

<0.001

   Notes: “Region” refers to sagebrush vs. Patagonian steppe, “ppt” refers to arid, intermediate, and semiarid study areas within each region, “distance” is the distance-from-water class, and “radiation” is potential radiation based on slope and aspect. Nonsignificant higher order interactions and covariates (radiation, sand content) were removed when not significant at = 0.10. Nonsignificant main effects (region, ppt, distance) were not removed, except in analyses of soil C and N.



[Back to A015-019]